Protecting Kyiv's Architectural Legacy: A City Reconstructing Its Foundations Amidst the Onslaught of War.
Lesia Danylenko beamed with pride as she displayed her newly installed front door. The restoration team had affectionately dubbed its ornate transom window the “pastry”, a whimsical nod to its curved shape. “In my opinion it’s more of a showy bird,” she remarked, gazing at its branch-like ornamentation. The renovation effort at one of Kyiv’s turn-of-the-century art nouveau houses was supported by residents, who celebrated with several impromptu pavement parties.
It was also an demonstration of resistance against an invading force, she elaborated: “Our aim is to live like everyday people in spite of the war. It’s about arranging our life in the optimal way. We have no fear of living in our homeland. I could have left, moving away to a foreign land. On the contrary, I’m here. The new entrance represents our allegiance to our homeland.”
“Our aim is to live like everyday people despite the war. It’s about shaping our life in the most positive way.”
Safeguarding Kyiv’s historic buildings seems unusual at a time when missile strikes regularly target the capital, causing death and destruction. Since the beginning of the current year, offensive operations have been dramatically stepped up. After each strike, workers cover broken windows with plywood and attempt, where possible, to secure residential buildings.
Within the Bombs, a Fight for History
In the midst of war, a group of activists has been working to conserve the city’s crumbling mansions, built in a distinctive style known as Ukrainian modernism. Danylenko’s house is in the historic Shevchenkivskyi district. It was erected in 1906 and was first the home of a affluent fur dealer. Its outer walls is decorated with horse chestnut leaves and delicate camomile flowers.
“These structures stand as symbols of Kyiv. These properties are increasingly scarce today,” Danylenko stated. The mansion was designed by an architect of Central European origin. Several other buildings nearby exhibit similar art nouveau elements, including asymmetry – with a gothic tower on one side and a turret on the other. One beloved house in the area boasts two sullen white stucco cats, as well as owls, masks and a demonic figure.
Dual Threats to History
But external attacks is only one threat. Preservation campaigners say they face unscrupulous developers who demolish listed buildings, corrupt officials and a administrative body unconcerned or hostile to the city’s profound architectural history. The severe winter climate imposes another difficulty.
“Kyiv is a city where money wins. We are missing real political will to save our heritage,” said Dmytro Perov, an activist. He claimed the city’s leadership was friends with many of the developers who destroy important houses. Perov stated that the concept for the capital harks back to a previous decade. The mayor has refuted these claims, stating they come from political rivals.
Perov said many of the community-oriented activists who once defended older properties were now engaged in combat or had been killed. The lengthy conflict meant that the entire society was facing monetary strain, he added, including those in the legal system who curiously ruled in favour of suspect new-build schemes. “The longer this persists the more we see degradation of our society and public institutions,” he argued.
Demolition and Disregard
One egregious demolition site is in the historic Podil neighbourhood. The street was lined with classical 19th-century houses. A developer who acquired the plot had agreed to preserve its attractive brick facade. Shortly following the 2022 invasion, heavy machinery demolished it. Recently, a crane excavated foundations for a new shopping and business centre, monitored by a stern security guard.
Anatolii Pohorily, a heritage supporter, said there was little optimism for the remaining blue-green houses on the site. Sometimes developers destroyed old properties while stating they were doing “scientific study”, he said. A previous regime also inflicted immense damage on the capital, rebuilding its primary street after the second world war so it could facilitate military vehicles.
Continuing the Work
One of Kyiv’s most notable defenders of historic buildings, a tour guide and blogger, was fell in 2022 while serving in a contested area. His colleague Nelli Chudna said she and other volunteers were continuing his important preservation work. There were at one time 3,500 masonry mansions in Kyiv, many constructed for the city’s successful business magnates. Only 80 of their original doors are still in existence, she said.
“It was not external attacks that eliminated them. It was us,” she admitted sadly. “The war could continue for another 20 years. If we fail to protect architecture now not a thing will be left,” she continued. Chudna recently helped to restore a characterful vine-clad house built in 1910, which acts as the headquarters of her cultural organization and also serves as a film set and museum. The property has a new red door and original-style railings; inside is a vintage sanitary facility and antique mirrors.
“The war could continue for another 20 years. If we don’t defend architecture now not a thing will be left.”
The building’s tenant, artist Yurii Pikul, described his home as “incredibly atmospheric and a little bit cold”. Why do many locals not cherish the past? “Sadly they do not have education and taste. It’s all about business. We are attempting as a country to move towards the west. But we are still some distance away from that standard,” he said. Previous ways of thinking persisted, with people hesitant to take personal responsibility for their built surroundings, he added.
Hope in Action
Some buildings are falling apart because of official neglect. Chudna indicated a once-magical villa concealed behind a modern hospital. Its roof had fallen; pigeons made their home among its broken windows; refuse lay under a whimsical tower. “Often we don’t win,” she conceded. “Preservation work is a form of healing for us. We are striving to save all this history and beauty.”
In the face of war and development pressures, these citizens continue their work, one building at a time, arguing that to preserve a city’s soul, you must first cherish its stones.